CRITICAL THINKING

Critical thinking exercises: can you still think without AI?

A question worth sitting with before your next prompt: if the AI went away tomorrow, would your judgment still work?

"The real AI divide may not be between those who can use AI and those who cannot. It may be between those who can still think critically without it and those who cannot."
— paraphrased from Nomrota Sarker's op-ed "When we outsource thinking to AI, what happens to human judgment?", The Daily Star, October 14, 2026

The paradox

Sarker's point, in short: we are building machines that process vast information, generate arguments, and imitate reasoning — while many societies rushing to adopt them struggle to teach the skills needed to question their answers: literacy, numeracy, critical thinking, media literacy, civic reasoning.

The divide that matters, the piece argues, isn't access to the tool. It's whether the habit of independent judgment survives the tool.

Critical thinking exercises: what the research says

The cognitive-offloading study

Researcher Michael Gerlich at SBS Swiss Business School surveyed 666 UK respondents and conducted 50 in-depth interviews. The findings, in plain language:

Honest limits: this is one study. It used self-report measures, and a correlation is not proof of causation — it could be that weaker critical thinkers reach for AI more, not (only) that AI weakens thinking. Treat it as evidence, not a verdict.

Why this is a security question

Scammers now write with the same fluent, confident AI you do. The phishing email, the fake invoice, the "urgent" message from your "boss," the deepfaked voice of your grandchild — they all read perfectly. Fluency is no longer a signal of truth.

That means the defense against AI-powered deception is exactly the habit Sarker describes: independent verification. Cross-check. Look for the source. Ask for the opposite argument. The person who verifies survives the fluent lie; the person who outsources judgment clicks it.

Critical thinking isn't just an academic virtue anymore. It's the firewall.

FROM INGENIOUS AI
Verification is a habit — and habits can be trained. Our free checkers do the same thing for scams, breaches, and AI risks: independent eyes on the claim.
All 11 platforms: DisclosureGuard  ·  ModelMinder  ·  TermsWatch  ·  Vibe-Code Audit  ·  Rogue-Agent Defense  ·  BreachHunter  ·  ChatBreaker  ·  Agent Flight Recorder  ·  Agent Auth Gateway  ·  DomainGuard  ·  ContentCraft AI
Our platforms are being upgraded and return November 1 — get early access now:
Get early access on WhatsApp →

The 6-question check: do you still think without AI?

Answer honestly. "Yes" means you actually do the habit — not that you intend to.

Honest scope

Frequently asked questions

What did the study of 666 people find about AI use and critical thinking?

Researcher Michael Gerlich at SBS Swiss Business School surveyed 666 UK respondents and found AI use and critical thinking moved in opposite directions (correlation r = -0.68). Mediation analysis suggested roughly 60% of the negative link ran through cognitive offloading. The study is correlational: it describes a pattern, not proven causation.

What is cognitive offloading?

Cognitive offloading is handing memory and problem-solving over to devices instead of doing the work yourself. In the study it was strongly linked to AI use (r = 0.72) and inversely linked to critical thinking (r = -0.75).

Why is critical thinking a security question?

Scammers now write with the same fluent, confident AI you do - phishing emails, fake invoices, and deepfaked voices all read perfectly. Fluency is no longer a signal of truth, so the defense is independent verification: cross-check, look for the source, ask for the opposite argument.

Which groups were most affected in the study?

Ages 17-25 used AI the most and scored lowest on critical thinking; those 46+ used it least and scored highest. In interviews, respondents with advanced degrees tended to cross-check AI answers while less-schooled respondents tended to follow the tool.

What does the 6-question check measure?

It tests verification habits: whether you check important AI answers against another source, look for sources yourself, test the opposite side, and can explain how you verified the last important AI answer you used.